These are bouts of concentrated and intense participation within defined communities of like-minded and similarly interested individuals driven by common and often specialized interests. Rather, established cultures and traditions of education also have a profound reciprocal influence on technologies. While understandable, these continuities certainly belie claims of radical transformation and disruption of the educational status quo. For instance, rather than extending educational opportunities to those who previously were excluded, the recent rise of the MOOC in countries such as the U.
This leaves any attempts to predict the likely influence of the Internet on future forms of education on uncertain ground. Yet it is equally unwise to presume that any of the examples given so far in the chapter necessarily herald a fundamental shift in education.
In this respect, perhaps the most significant issues that need to be considered about the Internet and education are sociological, rather than technical, in nature. In this sense, the Internet prompts a range of ideological questions rather than purely technical answers about the nature of education in the near future. Thus, as this chapter draws to a close we should move away from the optimistic speculation that pervades most educational discussions of the Internet. Instead, there are a number of important but less often acknowledged social, cultural, and political implications that also merit attention:.
First, then, is the way in which Internet-based education promotes an implicit individualization of practice and action. The Internet is celebrated by many educationalists as increasing the responsibility of individuals in terms of making choices with regards to education, as well as dealing with the consequences of their choice. Of course, this is usually assumed to work in favor of the individual and to the detriment of formal institutions. Yet the idea of the self-responsibilized, self-determining learner is based upon an unrealistic assumption that all individuals have a capacity to act in an agentic, empowered fashion throughout the course of their day-to-day lives.
Of course, only a privileged minority of people are able to act in a largely empowered fashion. As such this individualization of action leads to education becoming an area of increased risk as well as opportunity. These issues raise a number of important questions. What is the nature of the collective forms of Internet-based education? Is the Internet undermining or even eroding notions of education as a public good?
Another significant issue related to the increased educational significance of the Internet is the ways in which online data and information are now defining, as well as describing, social life. The Internet has certainly extended the significance of databases, data mining, analytics, and algorithms, with organizations and institutions functioning increasingly through the ongoing collection, aggregation, and re analysis of data. The collection and analysis of online data is now a key aspect of how actions are structured and decisions are made in many areas of education.
These data are used for a variety of purposes—including internal course administration, target setting, performance management, and student tracking. There are, of course, many potential advantages to the heightened significance of online data.
Yet, there is a clear need for caution amidst these potential advantages—not least how the increased prevalence of online data in education is implicated in the shaping of what people can and cannot do. For example, how are individuals and their learning being represented by data collected online?
How does the Internet support the connection, aggregation, and use of these data in ways not before possible? Thirdly, is the need to recognize the role of commercial and private actors in the growth of Internet-based education. Indeed, the role of the private sector is integral to many of the forms of Internet-based education described in this chapter.
Here is an example of how the essay on education should be structured properly. skills, knowledge, and brings positive changes in our life. Free Essay: These past four years have really been a life changing experience. From a childish freshmen not only at school but at home too, to a still.
A range of multinational commercial interests such as Pearson, Cengage, and McGraw-Hill are now involved heavily in the business of e-learning and online provision of teaching and training—competing with countless smaller commercial concerns and a range of nonprofit organizations. Of course, the increased involvement of commercial interests in online education could be seen to have many potential benefits.
The private sector is able to focus considerable technological resources and expertise on educational issues.
Face it. For example, how committed are IT producers and vendors to the public good of educational technology above and beyond matters of profit and market share? What are the moral and ethical implications of reshaping education along the lines of market forces and commercial values? Why should education correspond automatically with the needs of the digital economy? Finally—and perhaps less tangibly—there is also a sense that the Internet might be altering the psychological, emotional, and spiritual bases of education.
This raises questions of what is perhaps lost when one is able to engage with education at all times of the day and in all contexts? Is there something to be said for being able to disconnect from the pressures of education? Is learning best suited to some contexts and circumstances than others?
Many of the forms of online education described in this chapter could also be said to frame learning often inadvertently as a competitive endeavor. Thus while a sense of achievement at the expense of others may not be immediately apparent, the Internet could be seen as a means of humanizing, disguising, and intensifying the competitive connotations of learning. All these points also relate to the correspondences between the Internet and the altered emotional aspects of educational engagement.
In particular, many of the forms of Internet-based education described earlier in this chapter such as the virtual school or the MOOC could be said to involve learning being experienced on less immediate, less intimate, and perhaps more instrumental grounds. Certainly, the remote, virtual sense of learning online is qualitatively different to the embodied sense of face-to-face learning—both in advantageous and disadvantageous ways.
The predominantly optimistic rhetoric of transformation and change that currently surrounds the Internet and education distracts from a number of significant conflicts and tensions that need to be better acknowledged and addressed. There are, after all, many people who will be advantaged by more individualized, elitist, competitive, market-driven, omnipresent, and de-emotionalized forms of educational engagement.
The Internet clearly works for the millions of people who are learning online at this very moment.
Perhaps the most important point to consider is the well-worn tendency of digital technology to reinforce existing patterns of educational engagement—helping already engaged individuals to participate further, but doing little to widen participation or reengage those who are previously disengaged. To reiterate a key theme that has emerged throughout our discussion, underlying all of the issues raised in this chapter are questions of what sort of future education one believes in.
The future of education may well involve increased use of the Internet—but will not be determined by it.
Allen, Ansgar. Arora, Payal. A Digital Promise for Free Learning. Bernstein, Basil. New York: Peter Lang, Boyd, Danah, and Kate Crawford. Bush, Jeb, and Rosario Dawson. Chubb, John, and Terry Moe. Collins, Allan, and Richard Halverson. Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology. New York: Teachers College Press, Cuban, Larry. Eynon, Rebecca.
Winter: For some, success is raising their child to be a decent person, for another success might be making a lot of money. These institutions can vary according to different contexts. Since she seemed unclear about my request, I asked her again to no avail. To stop girls being excluded, or married off. My college English teacher Professor Fred W.
Horst et al. Luckin, Rosemary.
London: Routledge, Mitra, Sugata. Oblinger, Diana G.
Game Changers: Education and Information Technologies. Washington, D. Picciano, Anthony G.
Sennett, Richard. London: Allen Lane, Siemens, George. Open Learning Analytics. Berlin: Springer, Tapscott, Don. New York: McGraw Hill, Thomas, Douglas, and Seely Brown, John.